Category Archives: Uncategorized

Right brain, left brain: Does it matter?

Over the past couple of years, the Unitarian Universalist congregation to which I belong has increasingly become the Church of the Left Brain vs. the Right Brain. It now seems almost inevitable that any serious discussion will feature references to the left-brain/right-brain thing. Actually, its adherents refer to ‘brain balance,’ although they then trash the left side and seemingly want the right side to dominate. This is because the left side of the brain is supposedly where language, logic, and analysis get done, generally ruining the magic of life by reducing the seamless flow of existence into things, whereas the right side is where holistic and unfiltered perception, intuition, and wonder take place. More metaphorically, the left side is like a self-serving accountant, whereas the right side is a hippie flower-child.

I doubt that we gain anything from this perspective, and I have several reasons. I’ll give two below.

Continue reading

A sermon on morality

Recently, another member of the Unitarian Universalist (UU) congregation to which I belong gave a sermon on his cosmology as it concerns human morality. It dawned on me that I didn’t know the basic perspective of almost anyone else in my life, including the UU clergy and my family members, and it seemed like it would be interesting and instructive for more people to similarly share their ideas on this topic. So here I go, simplifying in order to keep it at the length of a sermon.

My answer is two-pronged: reasons to believe my explanation and reasons to discount other explanations.

First, let me be clear that, by values, I refer to what we think are the right and wrong ways to act. These include anything from prepared, explicit statements, such as the Unitarian Universalist covenant, to implicit ideas that find overt expression only in reaction to specific conditions. But values are not the same thing as people’s behavior, given that people will do things they believe are wrong, and they will treat some behaviors as basically neutral.

With that out of the way, the answer to the question is simple and probably obvious: we develop our values in interaction with our environment. This occurs in myriad ways, and the process can be implicit or explicit. For example, people teach each other, as I am attempting to do right now. In other cases, we pick up lessons, often without realizing it, by observing our own experiences and those of others. Short-term situations alter the strength and even content of our various values, such as, in my experience, when a person is drunk or high, has low blood sugar, is being physically attacked, or experiences libertas (e.g. on spring break), among other possibilities.

Continue reading

Is it clearly better that the Founders won?

Happy 4th of July! This is a good time (or possibly a very bad time) to ask: Was it really better overall that the colonies won the American Revolution? I’m not sure how to weigh the evidence.

The British colonial government ended slavery in its remaining American colonies in the 1830s; this was 30 years before the U.S. did – and only because the South brought the issue to a head by starting the Civil War. Also, the British colonial government was more likely than the United States to respect treaties with Indian groups. Indeed, the taxes to which the colonists famously objected were to pay the military costs of the colonists’ push west into Native American lands. Today Britain has universal health care and has elected women as prime minister. (But they do drive on the wrong side of the road.)

Continue reading

Best novel for your Mazatlán vacation (maybe)

Well, at least it’s a contender: About half of my novel, Bonobo!, takes place in a fictionalized version of Mazatlán. While the book turned into something broader, I began it as a way to share my knowledge about Mazatlán, where I performed ethnographic research on everyday life over a span of several years in the 1990s.

Or, if you find a plot unnecessary and prefer to cut to the chase (although actually there’s no chase), try my nonfiction work: Moral Compromises in Mazatlán.

Or read both! They’re quite affordable. At least something about your Spring Break in Mexico could be redeeming.

Condoms in, condoms out

From early on, I knew that my novel would include various – okay numerous – scenes of sex. But I thought about Bonobo! for several years, wrote large chunks, and plotted the whole shebang with hardly a prophylactic. Nonetheless, the text eventually ended up with almost fifty mentions of condoms. What changed?

Writing Bonobo! was my work when I wasn’t performing other jobs: college professor, editor, or researcher-for-hire. For example, while living in Uganda, I convinced a public-health organization to fund research on HIV-prevention from a novel perspective. As a pilot project, they contracted me to conduct a systematic review of research explaining patterns of condom-use in five African countries. So on the one hand I was writing a novel that included orgies and a lot of impromptu sex, while on the other I was focused on how to encourage people to use condoms.

On yet another hand, I couldn’t help but notice that young Ugandans seemed to pay much, much more attention to popular music than to public-health campaigns. What would be really effective, I hypothesized, is if rappers and dancehall artists were to drape condom packages on the gold chains around their necks or to brag about how many condoms they used per day (per capita?). It shouldn’t be some pasteurized, foreign-funded All-Star sing-along but a seemingly autochthonous amalgam of nastiness and prudence.

No one would confuse my philosophical bildungsroman for a literary rap video, but I knew that I had to put my novel where my mouth was. In time, condoms came to have a metaphorical role in the story as well. But it started from research and the desire to contribute what little I could to condoms’ cachet.

Orlando reactions: Where is the love?

After a gunman shot at the back of my head from a few feet away and, amazingly, missed, I thought a lot about what would have happened if I’d been killed. I never imagined that people would skip past the tragedy of my death to debate the shooter’s motives and access to guns. Continue reading

Another “Bonobo”?!

BonoboFilmSoon after I published my novel, Bonobo!, I searched for the title on Amazon to see what came up. To my surprise, I found a film titled Bonobo (no exclamation point), which had been released recently, too. Clearly, this idea’s time had arrived.

So I watched it. Continue reading

Could your back infection be metaphorical?

A Hologram for the King isn’t an especially good or bad film. Perhaps the most interesting aspect, for me, was the main character’s back infection. Having these while living overseas has become almost a hobby for me. So, as soon as the giant lump on Tom Hanks’ character’s (THC’s) back was revealed – while he was in Saudi Arabia, no less – I stopped scrolling through my Facebook feed and practically watched with attention.

Well, THC goes to the doctor, and she tells him, in so many words: we need to see whether this is the kind of back infection that Tracy gets or whether it’s metaphorical. The rest of the film made clear the differences between the two. To save you some money, here’s a synopsis: Continue reading

Graphing a plot

Austin Kleon’s Show Your Work! – a two-day read for me – has something useful for writers aside from its inspirational self-help advice. The section titled, “Structure is Everything,” includes nine different descriptions or graphs of story structures. They range from abstract models to Kurt Vonnegut’s graphs of three specific stories.

While I’m loathe to blindly follow a formula, it is useful to compare the narrative I’m writing to successful ones and to consider revisions as a result. Luckily, Kafka didn’t follow a standard, fairy tale approach in writing “Metamorphosis,” as Vonnegut’s hilarious (to me) graph makes clear.

Show my work?

For me, one of the oddities of producing a book is that getting it published and read causes at least as much anxiety as writing it does. As part of my continuing effort to figure out how to build a “platform,” I’ve started reading Show Your Work!, by Austin Kleon.

It’s short, so in one day I’ve read about 40 percent of it. That’s far enough to see that the title means that we should show our working selves – sharing aspects of our process in the hope of accruing not only followers but inspiration from others. Then, presumably, we’ll be able to ‘show our (finished) work’ to more people and with greater success.

Generally I like the gist of Kleon’s advice. One of my delights as an ethnographer was summarizing my research to the people whose lives I was trying to understand and hearing new complexities from them – likewise with professors and then colleagues. I’m not sure that I built much of a platform, but others’ ideas have strengthened my work.

Nonetheless, one of these days, I’ll write a caveat to this idea, based on my experience with writers’ groups. I might rewrite Kleon’s title as Show Your Work (but not to trolls).